Does advanced AI mean the end of our democracy?

For Business Insider, I recently wrote an article about the dangers for AI for democracy.
Read the article (in Dutch) here:

>>> Betekent geavanceerde AI het einde van onze democratie? Dit zijn de grootste bedreigingen volgens de auteur van Sapiens

A summary:

In Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, the Israeli historian Yuval Noah Harari traces the history of humanity from the earliest days of Homo sapiens to modern times. Harari’s central thesis is that human progress stems from our unique ability to collaborate and form complex societies, with stories and mythology playing a crucial role.

His latest book, Nexus, focuses on the information systems that people use to spread these stories and myths. For example, he describes the Bible as a particularly powerful technology that has profoundly influenced billions of people. This raises the question of what the rise of artificial intelligence – the most powerful technology we’ve ever encountered – will bring.

The new threat of AI
According to Harari, the current computer age is based on the openness of information. In other words, the freer information flows, the better society functions. However, the author believes this is a naïve view. Despite having vast amounts of information at our disposal, we’ve produced more weapons of mass destruction than ever, destroyed more habitats, and pumped billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, even though that information showed us we were inching closer to our own destruction. Will more information improve the situation? Tech optimists think so, like venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who wrote a widely read essay in 2023 explaining why AI will save the world and why the panic surrounding AI is, in his view, misplaced.

Other AI experts are less optimistic. In 2023, a group of top AI specialists – including the heads of OpenAI and Google DeepMind – warned that artificial intelligence could lead to human extinction. Dozens signed a statement published on the Center for AI Safety’s website. ‘Mitigating the risk of AI-induced extinction should be a global priority, alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war’, it reads.

Harari believes we need to be aware of the dangers and the more sinister side of artificial intelligence. By understanding the history of information networks, we can avoid mistakes. However, he also notes crucial differences between AI and past technologies. AI is not just a tool; it is an agent. It is the first technology capable of generating its own ideas and making decisions. This brings two major risks: it can amplify existing conflicts and further polarize the world, or worse, AI could become a totalitarian force that completely controls our lives and politics.

Manipulation and mass destruction through toxic information
Historically, information networks have always been vulnerable to manipulation. Harari gives examples of how toxic information has had disastrous consequences, such as the witch hunts in the Middle Ages and the persecution of the Rohingya in Myanmar, caused by Facebook algorithms that prioritized maximum ‘engagement’. Social media and AI can take this manipulation to new heights by creating mass illusions that weaken democracies.

Democracy is already under pressure from populist leaders who claim to be the only ones who understand the people’s needs and who sow doubt about democratic institutions such as the media, the courts, and politics. Research shows that social media further contributes to this political polarization. AI could accelerate this even more through advanced algorithms that spread disinformation and amplify extreme opinions. AI’s ability to control human language, simulate empathy, and manipulate people makes it even more dangerous in the political arena.

As billions of intelligent agents enter our information networks, the likelihood of new mass illusions arising, similar to Nazism, Stalinism, or the current ideologies of Putin’s Russia, increases significantly. After all, information and truth are not the same. Without measures to tip the balance in favor of truth, society risks being overwhelmed by a swamp of ‘alternative truths’, which could seriously endanger society and democracy.

Controlling AI and the struggle for truth
Harari emphasizes that taking responsibility for AI is essential. Tech companies like Facebook must be held accountable for the consequences of their algorithms, which often fuel hatred and polarization. Networks must develop self-correcting mechanisms that reward truth and counter disinformation.

Another important issue is the ‘alignment problem’: AI can come up with solutions that humans hadn’t anticipated, leading to unpredictable and undesirable outcomes. Harari advocates for developing AI systems that seek feedback before making decisions to prevent dangerous outcomes.

To protect democracy from AI, Harari calls for the decentralization of information networks and strict regulation of AI applications. AI mimicking humans, such as in chatbots, should be banned to prevent manipulation of the political process. Furthermore, companies like Amazon must become more transparent about their internal processes so that information doesn’t flow in just one direction.

Hope and future outlook
Harari is not entirely negative about technology and AI. As a gay man, he found no one to connect with in his small Israeli village, but through a Facebook group, he met his current husband. Nevertheless, his view of humanity is less optimistic than someone like Andreessen’s, and history seems to be on his side. The stakes have never been higher than they are now, in the AI era. With the unprecedented power of this technology, humanity cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the past.

The impact of AI on the global economy and the labor market will be enormous. The hope is that, amid the various superpowers, we can find common ground and stories that inspire us to make the right decisions so that AI contributes positively to the story of humanity and the evolution of life on Earth.

Double Bill #11: The Truman Show & The Matrix

Two masterpieces from the late ’90s, The Truman Show (1998) and The Matrix (1999), both revolve around protagonists who discover they’ve been living in an artificial reality. In The Truman Show, Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey) realizes that his entire life has been a carefully orchestrated television show, where everyone around him – his wife, parents, and best friend – is merely an actor. Similarly, in The Matrix, Neo (Keanu Reeves) learns that humanity is trapped in a simulated reality controlled by artificial intelligence, with people’s minds imprisoned while their bodies serve as mere power sources. In Truman’s case, the man behind his imprisonment is Christof (brilliantly portrayed by Ed Harris), a visionary television producer who will stop at nothing to maintain control over Truman’s life, ensuring the continued success of his wildly successful show. Neo, on the other hand, faces a more intangible and insidious enemy, namely rogue artificial intelligence. In the first film, this AI is represented through sinister agents, with Hugo Weaving delivering an unforgettable performance as Agent Smith. Both films captivate as they depict the journey of discovery – watching Truman and Neo slowly unravel the truth about their worlds is nothing short of enthralling. The moment of revelation in each film remains awe-inspiring, evoking goosebumps even after repeated viewings. Truman’s world, we learn, is enclosed in an enormous dome, a massive set visible from space, while Neo’s reality reveals him as a human battery in a sprawling field of organic towers, where infants are cultivated as power sources for the AI’s machinery. Interestingly, both films imbue the protagonists’ names with deeper significance. Truman is the only ‘true man’ in his artificial world, while Neo is an anagram of ‘ONE’, symbolizing his status as the singular anomaly within the Matrix, with the potential to bend its rules. Neo’s discovery of his unique abilities leads to some of the most iconic moments in cinematic history. In the end, both The Truman Show and The Matrix conclude with their heroes breaking free from their respective confinements, delivering an exhilarating sense of liberation. It’s a triumphant and cathartic experience for the audience, as well – leaving us with the best feeling in the world.

Read also: The Matrix And The Awakening To True Reality

The Verdict: The Creator

In 2016, director Gareth Edwards delivered Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, the first Star Wars movie that was not part of the main series. In terms of cinematography, locations, and visual effects, it was certainly successful, but the film failed to move me. I had exactly the same experience with Edwards’ latest film The Creator, which is about a future war between humanity and artificial intelligence. The movie, which was shot on beautiful locations in Thailand and contains Oscar-nominated special effects, certainly looks amazing. However, the story about an army sergeant (John David Washington, who increasingly looks and especially sounds like his father Denzel) who is on the run with a powerful AI child made no emotional impact on me whatsoever. I didn’t care whether humanity or AI would ultimately win the war. SPOILER: The contrast between what I felt when the Death Star was blown up in the original Star Wars and the destruction of space station Nomad at the end of The Creator could not be greater. A shame really, because the potential was certainly there.

The Creator is now available on Disney Plus

The verdict: to stream or not to stream? Not to stream

Double Bill #03: The Terminator & Terminator 2: Judgment Day

Forget all the sequels for a minute, and consider the first two The Terminator movies as a diptych. As a diptych, they work perfectly. The first one is a hyper tense thriller, the second one a sensational action movie. The major downside of The Terminator movies, I always thought, is that you have to accept an extremely unlikely plot point. We’re supposed to buy that in the future, the resistance somehow found out about the machines’ new time travel capabilities, and destroyed their one and only time machine after they used it for the very first time. Not only that, the resistance also managed to send through one of their own soldiers before they blew it up. Since the humans are shown to be pretty much cannon fodder in their own environment, how would they be able to penetrate the machines’ base of operations? Anyway, this plot device was necessary to get a futuristic killer robot into the present to stalk the Conners (Sarah in the first, John in the second). Once you accept this unlikely scenario, the execution of both movies is pretty much perfect. In the first Terminator, Schwarz is truly scary as the ultimate hunter-killer. A great move by writer-director James Cameron is that Arnie’s T-800 joins the good team in part 2, but it is now technologically outdated. The new and improved terminator – the T-1000 – is perhaps the coolest non-human character ever created for a film. These movies have inspired countless others with their stories and special effects. The Matrix would never have happened if it wasn’t for these terminators. With more than a whiff of philosophy (“it is in your nature to destroy yourselves”), the two The Terminator movies also deliver deeper, underlying messages apart from just giving us the spectacle. Although there is more than enough from that. In T2, it even goes on pretty much non-stop. You could consider that another downside or just as a realistic screenplay measure following the unlikely time travel plot. After all, once you have a killer like the T-1000 on your tail, a non-stop rollercoaster is what you would get.