Free-Consciousness is A-Live!!!

Today is the official launch of my new website: Free-Consciousness. It is the result of seven years of reading, researching and writing and I am super proud of the result. Check it out here: free-consciousness.com.

The first seed of the platform was sown in 2017 when I read the book ‘Biocentrism’. This paradigm shattering work forever altered my perspective on reality, and initiated my continuous search for figuring out how this process we call ‘the universe’ operates. The answers that I found were, and still are, absolutely mind boggling.

The purpose of Free-Consciousness is to give insights in an understandable way of why we must be living in a consciousness-based reality, and what this means for the notions we have about life, death, space and time, the material world and evolution.

The core of the platform at this starting point is the ‘Essays’ page for which I wrote 10 long essays (and 2 short introductory ones) that cover the entire model of my current thinking. It explains why our minds and the outside reality are the same thing, how space and time are mental algorithms that are part of the process we use to construct reality, and how in a timeless universe, death cannot be in any way ‘the end’.

In the next phase of this massive personal project, I will be working on promoting the platform, covering new discoveries on the ‘Mental Notes’ page, and preparing a new series of essays on topics such as DNA, psychedelics, Eastern philosophy and the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory.

I want to thank my amigo Arnold for his fantastic technical help in building the platform. I also want to thank Christiaan Drost, who designed the terrific central image for the homepage. I also want to thank my two loves Rosa & Loesje, for their ongoing mental support, love, inspiration, and so much more.

Einstein Vs. Bohr: The Great Debate

For my upcoming new platform Free-Consciousness, I am publishing some video fragments on the accompanying Youtube channel. One of these is a sequence from the Discovery series Genius in which Albert Einstein (Geoffrey Rush) and Niels Bohr (David Dencik) discuss the meaning of quantum physics for reality.

This is one of the most famous debates in science. Bohr played a huge role in formulating the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, which states that one cannot know anything about an object prior to a measurement, which means that the universe is indeterministic. Einstein did not like this. He was a realist, meaning that he believed that spacetime is real and exists independently of whether it is observed or not.

Einstein spent most of the second half of his career trying to disprove the Copenhagen Interpretation, most notably by coming up with the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox in 1935. This thought experiment involves a pair of entangled particles that are sent in opposite directions through space. According to Copenhagen, if you measure the position of one particle, you could instantly predict the position of the other entangled particle. This would violate Einstein’s laws of special relativity, because information between particles one and two would have to travel faster than light.

Of course, later experiments first conducted by Alain Aspect, Anton Zeilinger and John Clauser demonstrated that this is exactly what happens. The inescapable conclusion is that quantum entanglement exists and is non-local. Einstein’s locality is on shaky ground nowadays…. Anyway, If you regularly read my fragments, you know on whose side I am standing in this debate.

In the clip below, you can see that although Bohr’s view seems illogical and counter intuitive, it is 100% compatible with the findings of quantum physics.

De wetenschap achter ‘out-of-body-travel’

Het enige wat echt is, is bewustzijn. De rest is virtueel. Dat is de centrale boodschap van Thomas Campbell’s ‘My Big TOE’, een vuistdik boek dat de ware aard van de realiteit beschrijft.

Thomas Campbell (1944) is oorspronkelijk fysicus, maar hij begint zijn boek niet bij de natuurkunde, maar bij bewustzijn. Aan het begin van zijn carrière kreeg hij namelijk de kans onderzoek te doen naar Robert Monroe (1915-1995), een man die beweerde uit zijn lichaam te kunnen treden. Deze stelling wordt sterk bestreden door de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap. En dit is nog steeds hoe er cultureel wordt aangekeken tegen dergelijke fenomenen. Bij astrale projectie – hetgeen dat Monroe beweerde te kunnen – staat het volgende vermeldt op Wikipedia: ‘Er is geen wetenschappelijk bewijs dat er een bewustzijn of ziel is die gescheiden is van normale neurale activiteit of dat men bewust het lichaam kan verlaten en waarnemingen kan doen, en astrale projectie is gekarakteriseerd als een pseudowetenschap.’

Maar Campbell heeft een open geest en heeft nadrukkelijk subjectieve ervaring in zijn TOE (afkorting voor ‘Theory Of Everything’) opgenomen. Want, vindt de onderzoeker, als iets niet resoneert met je persoonlijke ervaring, hoe kun je het dan voor de waarheid aannemen? Daarom is My Big TOE niet een soort narcistische stellingname van de auteur, maar een manier om aan te geven dat een theorie van alles per definitie een subjectief component heeft. Iedereen ontwikkelt in feite een eigen theorie van alles die in lijn is met persoonlijke levenservaringen. En dus is het belangrijk, wanneer je het grotere plaatje wilt zien, om veel ervaringen op te doen die soms wellicht botsen met wat je beschouwt als mogelijk of verklaarbaar binnen je huidige wereldbeeld. Campbell leerde zelf uit zijn lichaam te treden, en zo te ervaren dat de geest niet opgesloten zit in het hoofd van het subject. Zo lijkt het alleen.

Hoe wist hij dit fenomeen – als wetenschapper – te bewijzen? Dit is zeer simpel, al zullen veel wetenschappers dit ook als pseudowetenschappelijk beschouwen. Monroe liet Campbell en een collega-onderzoeker samen uit het lichaam reizen en nam alles op wat ze tijdens het experiment zeiden. Ze bevonden zich in aparte, geluiddichte kamers en werd gevraagd real-time beschrijvingen te geven van wat ze ervaarden tijdens de out-of-body ervaring. Later speelden ze de twee lange opnames tegelijkertijd af en ontdekten ze verbazingwekkende correlaties tussen alles wat ze zeiden en ervoeren. Ze herhaalden het experiment vele malen met andere proefpersonen. Een ander experiment betrof het bewustzijn van de proefpersonen naar huizen van mensen te laten ‘reizen’, ze te laten kijken wat de bewoners aan het doen waren en later samen met hen te bevestigen of dit klopte. Ze waren ook in staat willekeurige getallen te onthouden die op schoolborden waren geschreven buiten de kamers waar hun lichaam lag te slapen, terwijl hun bewustzijn buiten hun lichamen reisde. En dus was de enige conclusie die Campbell’s kon trekken: dit fenomeen is echt.

Zie ook: A Shift In Scientific Worldview – Part 3: Thomas Campbell’s My Big TOE

Reality As an Act of Dreaming

Our reality is like a waking dream. It has rules, those we can study objectively (science). But they are not as steady as we may think. Quantum mechanics has revealed that beyond a steady appearance, there is only probability. It takes the act of observing to construct reality out of potentiality.

We used to think that God was the creator of our world and God resided outside of nature. Then Western science removed God, and we were left with nature without cause. Everything was explained as resulting from an extremely large series of random accidents. This worked partly, but many problems remained. Life and consciousness cannot be explained away by random accidents. Nor can randomness be a proper explanation for the immense ordered complexity we observe around us.

The solution was already present all along. Turns out that Eastern philosophy was closest to the edges of truth we can ever hope to get. God is not outside of nature. God IS nature. And since we are part of nature, we are also part of God. We are the mental hubs in a participatory universe.

According to the famous physicist John Wheeler, the universe is a self-referential ‘strange loop’ in which physics gives rise to observers, who then give rise to meaning – establishing observers – participants who grant a meaningful existence to the universe. The world and consciousness are intermingled in such a way that they mutually co-arise in a deeper unified sphere of being. It is impossible to say which initially caused the other, as their relationship has no beginning in time. Their relationship is reciprocal – now one side and then the other acts as a cause. Through the conscious observer in the dreamlike reality, the universe becomes a lucid dreamer.*


From: The Goldilocks Enigma by Paul Davies

Uncountable small acts of observer-participancy have over eons built up the tangible appearance of the material world. As observers, there is no getting around the fact that each of us are participants in bringing reality into being. Wheeler: “I can’t make something out of nothing, and you can’t, but together we can”. The universe is a collective shared dream that is too seemingly dense and solidified for any one person’s change in perspective to transform, but when a critical mass of people get into alignment and consciously put together what I call our “sacred power of dreaming” we can, literally change the waking dream we are having.”*

As agents of cosmic evolution, we are being invited to contribute to the growing edge of the universe’s creative unfoldment into uncharted territory. This is truly evolution in action, as we discover that we can actively participate in our own evolution, and in fact are being called to do so. We become (or maybe we always have been, but just didn’t know it) a channel for the universe to automatically re-create itself in a novel and evolutionary way. Or maybe I am just dreaming.*

*Segments taken from: The Quantum Revelation by Paul Levy

Read also: How The Goldilocks Enigma Is Another Major Indication For A Consciousness-Based Universe