5 Reasons ‘Scarface’ Rarely Makes it to Critics’ Favorite Lists

Me, I want what's coming to me.

‘Me, I want what’s coming to me.’

Although Brian De Palma’s 1983 gangster movie ‘Scarface’ is legendary within the popular culture domain, it is hardly considered a masterpiece, such as ‘The Godfather’, ‘The Godfather Part II’ and ‘GoodFellas’. Should it?

Yes, I definitely think so. There is no other movie that shows the rise and fall of a gangster more effectively than Scarface. Okay, the high is pretty brief – and consists mostly of a musical number (‘Push it to the limit’), during which Tony Montana (Al Pacino) is buying tigers and snorting lot’s of cocaine. But I guess that is what a gangster’s high would ultimately feel like; empty, shallow and unsatisfying. Even the kick of having the desirable Elvira (Michelle Pfeiffer) doesn’t last more than five minutes screentime.

The late film critic Roger Ebert – who awarded ‘Scarface’ a maximum of four stars – said it very poignantly. ‘The movie has been borrowed from so often that it’s difficult to understand how original it seemed in 1983, when Latino heroes were rare, when cocaine was not a cliché, when sequences at the pitch of the final gun battle were not commonplace. Just as a generation raised on ‘The Sopranos’ may never understand how original ‘The Godfather’ was, so ‘Scarface’ has been absorbed into its imitators.’

‘Scarface’ is listed in IMDb’s Top 250 (position 117), but that list is put together by users’ votes. On critic lists, such as the AFI 100 Best American Films, the All Time 100 (by Time) or Rotten Tomatoes’ 100 highest ranked films, it doesn’t appear. So what is it about ‘Scarface’ that obstructs it from being seen as a masterpiece, like the before mentioned gangster classics? Here are the five most probable reasons:

1.  The chainsaw scene
Scarface 1 - The chainsaw scene
Gangster films are violent, that is accepted. But Coppola and Scorsese have a way of turning even the most off-putting bit of violence into something really stylish and cinematic. The way De Palma handles the chainsaw scene, 24 minutes within the movie, is just plain ugly. ‘Now the leg huh’, remarks the sadistic Hector as he puts the saw in Tony Montana’s friend. This scene alone puts ‘Scarface’ in the extreme cinema league. And films that are extreme in this sense are rarely considered as Academy Award contenders.

2. The general ugliness
Scarface 2 - Ugly Car
Most of it is done deliberately, but the look and feel of ‘Scarface’ is just ugly dugly. That shirt that Montana is wearing, holy Christ! Also look at the sets. Miami in the eighties is just terrible. From the refugee camp where Montana and his partners murder the communist Rebenga, to the Miami Beach area where they start their careers as drug runners, these locations are just god awful. The language doesn’t help either: ‘Why don’t you try sticking your head up your ass, see if it fits’, Montana tells Hector. Can you hear Vito Corleone utter such a line? Or how about this one: ‘This town is like a great big pussy just waiting to get fucked.’ That doesn’t sound like ‘Casablanca’ does it? Last but not least: the music. From the cringe worthy synthesizer sounds to eighties hits like ‘She’s on Fire’. It is so wrong, it’s right.

3. The general foulness
Scarface 3 - The Clown
‘Scarface’ is in the end a very cynical movie in which the American Dream can only be achieved through extreme violence and corruption. Tony’s quest for power leads to ton’s of dead bodies: even a clown is whacked for god’s sake! A world in which a vile assassin like Tony Montana is the ultimate hero, is just very hard to accept. And the film gets uglier and uglier as it progresses. Tony’s drunken diner speech is the ultimate example of the repellent worldview on display. ‘Is this it? That’s what it’s all about, Manny? Eating, drinking, fucking, sucking? Snorting? Then what? You’re 50. You got a bag for a belly. You got tits, you need a bra. They got hair on them. You got a liver, they got spots on it, and you’re eating this fucking shit, looking like these rich fucking mummies in here… Look at that. A junkie. I got a fucking junkie for a wife. She don’t eat nothing. Sleeps all day with them black shades on. Wakes up with a Quaalude, and who won’t fuck me ‘cause she’s in a coma. I can’t even have a kid with her, Manny. Her womb is so polluted; I can’t even have a fucking little baby with her!’ It is kind of depressing when he puts it like that.

4. The sister storyline
Scarface 4 - Sister Shooting at Tony
Incest is never a pleasant topic, and even though nothing actually happens sexually between Tony and his sister Gina, it still raises some controversy. It also adds further to the already unpleasant vibe that the movie creates. Tony’s sickening jealousy of every man who even looks at his sister, let alone touches her, leads to aggression and eventually the murder on his best friend Manny. One of the hardest parts to watch involves Gina walking into Tony’s study, undressed, asking him to fuck her while shooting at him.

5. The over-the-top climax
Scarface 5 - Climax
The climax of ‘Scarface’ is so over the top that it is hard to comprehend during the first viewing. Many gangster films end with a massacre, but this is Rambo on cocaine. Fitting how this ending may be, it is so much of everything, that it may affect the judgment of its more critical audience.

None of this really matters though. ‘Scarface’ is a true classic. And though it may not always be appreciated as it should, ‘every dog has its day.’ ‘Scarface’ could go right to the top.

Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens

Six Chicks in search of a Cluck! …and so hilariously funny!

Director: Russ Meyer
Written by: Russ Meyer, Roger Ebert
Cast: Kitten Natividad, Ken Kerr, Uschi Digard, Ann Marie

Year / Country: 1979, USA
Running Time: 93 mins.

Although Russ Meyer’s final feature film is not a masterpiece, it is one hell of a funny movie. The paper thin story involves simple mind Lamar Shedd and his steamy Vixen wife Lola Langusta (Lavonia – hotter than a Mexican’s lunch).

Stuart Lancaster gives us the lowdown on Small Town USA, a redneck township where simple guys and girls have simple needs. In the daytime they work as mechanics and door-to-door salesmen and at night… well, guess you know what they do at night. Of course this is a Meyer movie in which the girls have all the power.

Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens takes on sexual conventions and the sexy main chick kicks the anal loving redneck in the groin. But this is part of the central love story between Lamar and Lavonia. He can only get satisfaction through the backdoor and she is just a little too enthusiastic. Typical content for Meyer who wrote the script with no one less than film critic Roger Ebert!

If you want to have a really great time, watch Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens. It got more bush than Texas politics and roundings greater than the Himalayas. And as a story of women’s liberation is supposed to be like, the women are always on top of things.

Rating:

Biography: Russ Meyer (1922, California – 2004, California) is known primarily for making a large number of sexploitation flicks, such as Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! and Vixen! He did almost everything – directing, writing, editing – himself. He even did the distribution of his own movies. In the cult / exploitation circuit his films did very well and made him more than enough money to continue his film career. In the late seventies, Meyer retired as a wealthy man. Many of his films are nowadays considered as cult classics.

Filmography: The French Peep Show (1950, short doc), The Immortal Mr. Teas (1959), The Naked Cinema (1961, short), Eve and the Handyman (1961), Erotica (1961), Wild Gals of the Naked West (1962), Skyscrapers and Brassieres (1963, short), Europe in the Raw (1963, doc), Heavenly Bodies (1963), Lorna (1964), Fanny Hill (1964), Mudhoney (1965), Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! (1965), Motor Psycho (1965), Mondo Topless (1966), Common Law Cabin (1967), Good Morning… and Goodbye! (1967), Finders Keepers, Lovers Weepers! (1968), Vixen! (1968), Cherry, Harry & Raquel! (1970), Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970), The Seven Minutes (1971), Black Snake (1973), Supervixens (1975), Up! (1976), Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens (1979), Pandora Peaks (2001, short)

Wise Guys (1986)


‘What kind of guys gamble with the boss’s money, swipe a killer’s Cadillac, and party on the mob’s credit card?’

Directed by:
Brian De Palma

Written by:
George Gallo
Norman Steinberg

Cast:
Danny DeVito (Harry Valentini), Joe Piscopo (Moe Dickstein), Harvey Keitel (Bobby DiLea), Ray Sharkey (Marco), Dan Hedaya (Anthony Castello), Lou Allano (Frank ‘The Fixer’ Acavano), Julie Bovasso (Lil Dickstein), Patti LuPone (Wanda Valentini), Antonia Rey (Aunt Sadie), Mimi Cecchini (Grandma Valentini)

The reason GoodFellas isn’t titled Wise Guy – after the book it’s based on – is that this film, a mob comedy by none other than Brian De Palma, got there first. It starts with Harry Valentini (Danny DeVito) doing a Travis Bickle impression in front of the mirror. This tells us everything we need to know about his character: he tries to act tough but is really just an errand boy for the local New Jersey mafia, alongside his friend and next-door neighbor, the Jewish Moe Dickstein (Joe Piscopo).

These two are the laughingstock of the crew led by Anthony Castello (Dan Hedaya). They’re stuck with humiliating tasks: doing groceries, testing a new bulletproof vest, and starting the car rigged with explosives.

When they’re forced to place a bet for the boss, compulsive gambler Harry bets on the wrong horse, assuming Castello’s pick would lose. Turns out the race was fixed, and now they owe him 250,000 dollars. As punishment, the boss orders them to kill each other. The wise guys catch wind of this and flee to Atlantic City, desperate to escape their predicament.

De Palma – known for suspense and gangster classics – had made comedies before, like Greetings and Hi, Mom!. While certainly no masterpieces, he developed his own style, and some jokes land: like the sped-up shot of the entire street fleeing when Harry starts the rigged car, or when Harry and Moe deliberately wreck the Cadillac they stole from a hated crew member.

It’s curious, though, that between making two of the decade’s greatest gangster films – Scarface (1983) and The Untouchables (1987) – De Palma made this pretty mediocre mob comedy.

Critics largely panned it, but Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel loved it. Ebert gave it three-and-a-half stars out of four, writing, “Wise Guys is an abundant movie, filled with ideas and gags and great characters. It never runs dry.” Siskel awarded it a perfect four stars, raving, “Big laughs, foul language to the point of absurdity, and one hilarious, screaming performance atop another combine to make Wise Guys one of the funniest times you will have at the movies this year.”

You’ll have to see for yourself if you’re one of the few people to agree.

Rating:

Quote:
HARRY: “Let’s put this $10.000 on my Baby to win. Or do you wanna die in Newark?”

Trivia:
Martin Scorsese’s parents – Catherine and Charles Scorsese, who are also in other gangster films like GoodFellas and The Godfather Part 3 (only Catherine) are featured as birthday guests.