Dan Brown’s ‘The Secret of Secrets’ Explores a Radical New Paradigm of Consciousness

Is the world headed to a new scientific mindset? I think this might be happening, even though with the current political hellscape in the USA, the Ukraine war still raging, the genocide in Gaza, and countless other atrocities unfolding across the globe, it can feel as if human evolution is running backwards.

Yet online – in discussion forums, academic debates, and emerging intellectual communities – there are signs that the long-standing dominance of materialism may be beginning to fade.

Changing the collective ‘mega-mind’ of the public is no small feat; such shifts often take generations. Quantum mechanics brought the mind into the realm of physics as early as the twentieth century, and yet public understanding of consciousness has remained largely unchanged.

What is a huge contributor to a new mindset is popular culture. New ways of thinking can spread virus-like, thanks to books, movies, television series, social media, and now also A.I. The material mindset – that sees the universe as unintelligent, and life and consciousness as having no relation to the physical world – has been largely resistant to change.

For that to change, the biocentric ideas researched on my website Free-Consciousness.com have to reach a contagion level, so that they can replicate like a virus. It cannot be predicted when this will happen, but products of popular culture can help to speed up the transition. The latest of such products is a brand new novel by best selling author Dan Brown (‘The Da Vinci Code’). It is called ‘The Secret of Secrets’ and it’s the sixth novel in the Robert Langdon series.

The book opens with the near-death experience of a neuroscientist. She explains to herself in clear terms that what she is experiencing – floating above the city of Prague, massless, and formless – cannot be happening. In the materialist perspective, death is the end and all experience, which is created by chemical compounds held in suspension by electrical charges in our brains, dissolve into nothing. The afterlife is a shared illusion… created to make our actual lives more bearable.

This is the typical materialist mindset. Brown immediately invites the reader to question that assumption…

Read the Entire Essay on Free-Consciousness (Free-Access)

John & Paul: A Love Story in Songs

‘Ticket to Ride’ glints with meanings; you can walk around it forever and see different shafts of light bounding off its surfaces. It’s about a break-up, viewed through a haze of pot smoke. It’s about a generational shift in the balance of power between men and women. It’s about a shift in the balance of power between John and Paul, as John comes to suspect that Paul doesn’t rely on him quite as much as he relies on Paul.’

This new book by British author Ian Leslie tells the story of John Lennon’s and Paul McCartney’s intimate relationship. Starting with their first meeting at the Woolton Village Fête and ending with Paul’s response to John’s death in 1980. It tells the story by way of the richest primary source of all: the songs they wrote together. Each chapter is anchored in a song that tells us something about the state of their relationship at that time. The main point is that even after the Beatles broke up, John and Paul were inseparable. They merged their souls and multiplied their talents to create the greatest bodies of music in history.

This is also a love story. John and Paul were more than just friends or collaborators in the sense that we normally understand these terms. Their friendship was in a sense a romance, full of longing and passion, riven by jealousy.

The biographical stories told aren’t new – although I certainly learnt new things – but Leslie’s approach still feels fresh. The psychology behind the stories is what sets it apart. Every anecdotal story is approached by how things must have felt and been experienced by John and Paul. It delves into their state of mind at the time certain songs were written.

The first song Leslie discusses is ‘Come Go With Me’, which John performed with the Quarrymen at the Woolton Village Fête. His improvised lyrics impressed Paul, who realized they might connect through a shared passion for music and songwriting. It moves on with their first songs: ‘I Lost My Little Girl’ by Paul and ‘Hello Little Girl’ by John. This was right away the first instance in which the two were borrowing and building on each other’s ideas.

They began writing songs together, something nobody was doing at that time except the Great Ones from America. The two trusted each other enough to let the other hear their unfinished work, and the more they shared the closer they became.

They bonded even more deeply over the loss of their mothers—Paul at 14, John at 17. Paul: “Each of us knew that had happened to the other. At that age you’re not allowed to be devastated and particularly as young boys, teenage boys, you just shrug it off.” It shattered them he later said, but they had to hide how broken they felt. “I’m sure I formed shells and barriers in that period that I’ve got to this day. John certainly did.”

Shells and barriers are defensive fortifications, but for John and Paul this shared trauma also blasted open an underground tunnel through which they were able to communicate in secret from the rest of the world, and even from themselves. In music they could say what they felt without having to say it at all. In 2016, McCartney told Rolling Stone Magazine: “Music is like a psychiatrist. You can tell a guitar things that you can’t tell people. And it will answer you with things people can’t tell you.”

The story goes on with their rise in Hamburg and then in Liverpool. Those who knew the pair marveled at how close they were. Bernie Boyle, a Cavern regular who did some work for the Beatles as a roadie, observed their eerie mental connection: “They were so tight, it was like there was a telepathy between them: on stage, they’d look at each other and know instinctively what the other was thinking.”

People were drawn to them, but were also wary of them, for both were capable of shriveling outsiders with wit. Together they had an aura of unbreachable assurance. This was partly the arrogance of the damaged. The well known trauma psychiatrist Bessel van der Kolk observes: “After trauma the world becomes sharply divided between those who know and those who don’t.”

In their early years, McCartney brought in ballads to their performances like ‘Till There Was You’. John felt discomfort during those moments, but he realized that these songs contributed to the band’s more varied approach than just rock ‘n roll. Besides, John – despite his tough image – secretly also loved the genres that they both got familiar with in their childhood, like folk, music hall, jazz and show-tunes.

It was the song ‘Please Please Me’ that really got the Lennon-McCartney songwriting partnership going. At that point, it became a second revenue stream within the band just for the two of them. ‘Please Please Me’ was their first number one hit and was the final move towards the Lennon-McCartney songwriting explosion that would soon be unleashed.

The book goes on to describe many of the songs that followed, focusing on how John and Paul conceived them, delivered them, and why their combination of voices and sensibilities made the music so enduring. Leslie also teases out the hidden meanings some songs carried for each of them; messages they sometimes couldn’t say directly.

There were also differences in their approach to songwriting. John’s song ideas were often used as a creative platform to which the others could bring their brilliant contributions. Paul – the most accomplished musician and instrumental allrounder – tended to bring more fully fledged songs to the band with clear ideas of what he wanted.

In the first five albums, John was mostly the song originator of the band. Paul’s ‘Yesterday’ was an important moment in their relationship, argues Leslie. John always felt uncertain about it, perhaps because it showed that Paul was such a brilliant songwriter in his own right and that he could do without John. After the break-up, John wrote ‘Imagine’ and according to a collaborator at that time, John felt he had finally written a melody as good as ‘Yesterday’.

After the creative highlight that was ‘Sgt. Pepper’s’, the disintegration of the band started in John’s mind. During their time in India, John was depressed as evident by songs such as ‘I’m So Tired’ and ‘Yer Blues’. The Beatles had been his closest connection and had pulled him through the most difficult of times. Now, it was time to start anew.

Leslie covers the break-up and post-break-up years in great detail, showing how the songs of that period reflect what was going on in their minds. For example, John’s ‘Look At Me’ – which was written in India – is about John’s sense of identity hanging on by being seen by Paul, his creative partner. And if he is not being seen by Paul, who is he supposed to be?

After the break-up, their connection always remained strong and they always kept communicating through music. There were the famous songs at which they were having digs at each other (‘Too Many People’ and ‘How Do You Sleep?’). There was also the instance of John’s final live performance at a concert by Elton John. He chose three songs to perform and one of them was ‘I Saw Her Standing There’. Why did he choose this Paul-song? Because he was scared and needed to summon Paul to get him though, Leslie argues.

The book ends with John’s murder and Paul’s heartbreaking response. The bond was severed forever, yet Paul found a way to keep speaking to John – as always through music. His song ‘Here Today’ is a conversation with the friend, rival, and partner he could never replace.

Van Capo tot CEO: Bedrijfslessen van de maffia

Voor de jaarlijkse CFO Day vonden we bij Sijthoff Media dit jaar een bijzondere spreker. Jan-Joost Kroon is organisatiedeskundige én maffia-expert. Sinds hij Scarface zag in zijn jeugd is hij gefascineerd door de Italiaanse en Siciliaanse misdaadorganisaties.

Hij vond mijn blogs over gangsterfilms erg tof – en we hadden dus meer dan genoeg reden om bij elkaar te komen voor een sit-down. Erg leuk om iemand te ontmoeten die weet wie Anthony ‘The Ant’ Spilotro en Benjamin ‘Lefty’ Ruggiero zijn.

In 2022 bracht hij een boek uit dat de basis was voor zijn CFO Day verhaal: ‘Van CAPO naar CEO: Leerzame inzichten van de Italiaanse maffia’.

In zijn boek bestudeert hij de Drie, de drie grote organisaties/families die de georganiseerde misdaad besturen in Italie en Sicilie:
● ‘Ndrangheta – Oorsprong: Calabrië
● Camorra – Oorsprong: Napels
● Cosa Nostra – Oorsprong: Sicilië

Deze Zuid-Italiaanse organisaties zijn al decennialang succesvol – hun gezamenlijke jaaromzet wordt geschat op zo’n 150 miljard euro. Jan-Joost beschrijft hoe dat succes tot stand komt.

Sterke tradities
Iedere business professional kent de uitspraak ‘culture eats strategy for breakfast’. Een hele serie tradities houdt de organisatie bij elkaar. Denk aan de doop van Michael Corleone’s neefje in The Godfather, de ceremonie in The Sopranos waarin van Christopher Moltisanti een ‘made guy’ wordt gemaakt, en het communiefeest van Michael Corleone’s zoontje waarmee The Godfather: Part 2 geopend wordt. Rituelen borgen de groepsidentiteit.

Loyaliteit
Het zakelijkste succesvol van de Drie is nu de ‘Ndrangheta met een geschatte omzet van 80 miljard euro per jaar. Terwijl de Cosa Nostra een tijdlang met de Italiaanse staat in gevecht was, is de ‘Ndrangheta in stilte doorgegroeid. Het is een echt familiebedrijf, schrijft Jan-Joost. Alleen familie komt erbij via een gearrangeerd huwelijk. Krachtig, want familie verraad je niet zomaar. Plus voor familie ben je bereid een stap extra te zetten.

Flexibiliteit
De Camorra kan meer vergeleken worden met een MKB-bedrijf vanwege de flexibiliteit, de compacte manier van werken en de snelheid waarmee ze handelen en inspringen op kansen. Zoals na de grote aardbeving van 1980 was de Camorra er als de kippen bij om bouwcontracten af te sluiten voor de bouw van nieuwe huizen. De maffia kent geen comfort keuzes: ze zijn altijd bezig met de volgende stap. Met actie. Met de beste willen zijn.

Onderdeel van de lokale samenleving
Het bekendste van de drie is nog altijd de Cosa Nostra – vrij vertaald: ‘onze zaak’. Deze organisatie heeft een klassieke piramidestructuur en functioneert als een soort multinational die in elk economisch aspect van een regio meespeelt. Ze bepaalt wat er wél en niet gebeurt in de wijk. Door slim in te spelen op het wantrouwen richting de Noord-Italiaanse overheid, positioneert de Cosa Nostra zich als beschermheer: “Laat die mensen in Rome maar, wij weten wat hier speelt en zorgen voor jullie.”

Heldere rolverdeling en structuur
De kracht van de Cosa Nostra zit hem in de sterke structuur en de duidelijkheid van ieders werkzaamheden. De organisatie zélf is de kracht, een leider kan vervangen worden. Iedere medewerker van een maffia-organisatie weet wat er van hem verwacht wordt en hoe hij kan bijdragen aan het succes. Ontwikkelkansen voor persoonlijke carrière zijn daarmee ook duidelijk. De maffia heeft ook heldere kernwaarden die nooit veranderen: Eer, loyaliteit, macht en respect.

Goed in talentmanagement
De maffia blijkt verrassend goed in talentontwikkeling. Een belangrijke les: bemoei je niet te veel met het werk van je mensen. Vind de juiste mensen, leid ze goed op, geef heldere kaders, en laat ze dan hun werk doen. De leiding is wel beschikbaar, maar niet betuttelend. Ook op het gebied van belonen en straffen valt er iets te leren. Bij de maffia zijn de consequenties van falen of succes kraakhelder. In veel bedrijven ontbreekt die duidelijkheid.

De maffia is een blijver
Jan-Joost beschrijft ook hoe diep de maffia-politiek verweven is met de samenleving, en waarom hij denkt dat deze organisaties – mede door culturele factoren – nooit zullen verdwijnen. Een schokkende constatering, maar overtuigend onderbouwd. Het versterkt het centrale punt van zijn boek: de maffia is, hoe immoreel ook, een extreem goed geleide, veerkrachtige en succesvolle organisatie. Daar kun je als bedrijfsleider van leren – zónder mee te gaan in het gebrek aan ethiek.

LEES OOK: 10 Management Lessons From Highly Successful Gangsters

#####

Hieronder nog een LinkedIn-post van Jan Joost:

Graphic Novel Classics: The Thirteenth Floor

Graphic novel which ran from 1984 till 1987 in the weekly comic magazines Scream! and Eagle. The story is about a tower building and the A.I. Max that governs it. Max his primary directive is ensuring the welfare of his tenants, a job he takes extremely seriously. Whenever their wellbeing is being threatened by outsiders, he takes these perps to the thirteenth floor, a nightmarish virtual world Max invented, where he can treat them to a frightening punishment for their wrongdoings. We, as readers, quickly become accomplices of the friendly Max, who has the most creative mind for coming up with the most fiendish lessons for horrible people who deserve a lesson. But after more and more people start dying or disappearing, a nosy detective figures something strange might be happening at Maxwell Tower… The beautiful black and white art work is drawn by José Ortiz and the stories are written by John Wagner and Alan Grant. Rebellion Developments, who also re-published classic ‘The Rise and Fall of the Trigan Empire’ by Don Lawrence, recently published ‘The Thirteenth Floor’ in a number of beautiful books. Highly recommended. Not to be confused with the science fiction movie The Thirteenth Floor (1999) which is also about virtual worlds.