Easy Riders, Raging Bulls

BBC documentary (2003) by Kenneth Bowser, based on the book by Peter Biskind. Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex-Drugs-and-Rock ‘N Roll Generation Saved Hollywood tells the story of Hollywood in the 1960s, a time when the studio system was in crisis. Their films had become increasingly irrelevant.

The problem was that movies were run by studios rather than directors, and the studios had lost touch with what audiences wanted to see. Then a new generation of filmmakers emerged who reconnected with viewers. Directors such as George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorsese, Dennis Hopper, Sam Peckinpah, Francis Ford Coppola, Arthur Penn, Warren Beatty, Robert Altman, Jack Nicholson, and Peter Bogdanovich.

“In 1963 the studio system collapsed”, says Bogdanovich. “It was over.” After the disaster of Cleopatra (1963, Joseph L. Mankiewicz, Rouben Mamoulian), the Fox lot was shut down. It became a ghost town. Television took over. The old moviegoers died off, and American films grew more and more meaningless.

Meanwhile, art theaters screening foreign films were doing very well. Many of the new generation of filmmakers learned the language of cinema from auteurs like Fellini, Godard, and Truffaut.

Outside the studio system, Roger Corman played a pivotal role in training young filmmakers to make low-budget B-movies that performed well at the box office. Jonathan Demme, Martin Scorsese, Ron Howard, and Francis Ford Coppola all started under Corman. They succeeded by targeting the youth who flocked to the thousands of drive-in theaters across the country, audiences that loved horror and action. Corman also had a knack for choosing hot topics: Hells Angels were in the news, so he made The Wild Angels (1966, Roger Corman). LSD was trendy, so he made The Trip (1967, Roger Corman) based on a screenplay by Jack Nicholson.

In Hollywood, directors proved just how out of touch the studios were. Executives hated Bonnie and Clyde, but young people loved it. Studios had to adapt. Paramount, in deep trouble, was taken over by Gulf & Western, led by the eccentric Austrian Charlie Bluhdorn. He brought in the now-legendary Bob Evans as a producer, who helped turn the studio around. How? By giving directors more creative control. Like he did with Polanski, who made Rosemary’s Baby in 1968.

At Columbia, Bert Schneider also trusted and empowered directors, resulting in massive hits, most notably Easy Rider, released in 1969. The drug-fueled chaos of director Dennis Hopper and his team is visible on screen. It was a great film, and audiences loved it. It was the kind of movie that never would have been made under the old studio system. The same goes for Midnight Cowboy by John Schlesinger, also released in 1969 – an outstanding film. That same year saw The Wild Bunch by Sam Peckinpah, which pushed violent realism to a whole new level.

The 1970s began, and the director’s era was in full swing. Peter Bogdanovich released The Last Picture Show in 1971, a film rich in emotional depth and sexual content, more than audiences were used to at the time. Dennis Hopper tried to follow up on Easy Rider with The Last Movie, but botched the edit due to his drug use and constant partying. “I had final cut, but I cut my own throat,” he says in the documentary.

In 1972, Paramount released The Godfather in 4,000 theaters simultaneously, a massively successful strategy. The history of that production was recently chronicled in the excellent miniseries The Offer. Coppola had now become one of the greats. He used his influence to bring George Lucas back to Hollywood, where he made the wildly successful American Graffiti in 1973 – a film studios didn’t understand, but youth audiences loved. That same year marked the rise of another major talent: Martin Scorsese, whose Mean Streets won over critics and audiences alike with its originality and authenticity.

But 1973 belonged to Warner Bros., which released The Exorcist by William Friedkin. Using the same wide-release strategy as The Godfather, it became a huge box office hit. It was Friedkin’s second success after The French Connection, cementing his status as one of the untouchable directors of the time.

By now, the auteurs had taken over Hollywood. This led to artistic triumphs like Chinatown (1974). But the young directors hadn’t forgotten Corman’s trick of attracting young audiences. In 1975, Spielberg released Jaws, a film that redefined what success looked like in Hollywood. Corman said: “When I saw Jaws I thought: these guys know what I’m doing, and they have the money and talent and skills to do it better.” George Lucas took it even further with Star Wars in 1977. The age of the blockbuster had arrived.

It had taken a decade, but Hollywood was back on its feet. Expensive B-movies like Alien, Superman, and their sequels became the new studio model. For about ten years, directors ruled. That era came to an end in the late ’70s, but it was a glorious decade that produced countless classics – films still regarded today as some of the greatest ever made.

It’s Official: The Acolyte is Disney’s First Real Star Wars Failure

In recent years, Disney has released one Star Wars series after the other. Most were pretty good with especially The Mandalorian and Andor getting rave reviews. The latest is The Acolyte, of which the first two episodes were released on June 5 on Disney Plus.

If you ask the critics, the series is a successful addition to the SW universe. If you ask the fans you get quite a different view. At IMDb, the show is currently rated with a painful 3,4 and most of the 1.5 K user reviews are extremely negative. A sample of the comments: ‘Jar Jar Binks was a museum masterpiece next to this’, ‘this is laughably bad writing & direction’ and ‘the worst Star Wars project since the Holiday Special.’ Autch.

I am aware of the fact that Star Wars fans are notoriously difficult to please. Many of the prequels and sequels were also harshly criticized when they first came out, although since the Disney takeover of Lucas Film, the prequel films by George Lucas’ have risen somewhat in popularity again .

After viewing the first five episodes of The Acolyte, I have to say I am with the fans on this one though. Judging the series on the basis of plot, characters, acting, action and atmosphere, I find it to be a pretty terrible show. Yes, the fifth episode indeed contains some excellent lightsabre action, but because the writing is so weak, the showdowns lose almost all of their potential impact.

The Acolyte is the first series to venture outside of the Skywalker era. It takes place about a hundred years before the rise of the Empire in the peaceful High Republic era. The story revolves around a female force user who is killing off Jedi’s. Her twin sister is accused of the crime, but after her innocence is proven, she joins the Jedi in order to track down her sister and we learn of their family tragedy that caused her sister to crave for revenge. We also learn that she is guided by a dark master, whose appearance is very Sith-like.

The main point thematically, seems to be that the Jedi themselves can be an oppressive force, which in this case has resulted in the rise of evil. The problem is that the characters and their motivations are not one bit convincing. It is also problematic that this feels like another rise of the Sith story for which we have no need. Lucas has done this already in the prequels, and in my opinion he did a fine job, although certainly not flawless.

The show really gets embarrassing in episode 3 when the Witches are introduced: a new group of force users. The dialogues make George Lucas seem like a William Shakespeare. Things don’t improve in the following episodes. Were there no question marks with the producers when they read the scripts? What is it that convinced them to invest 180 million dollars (!) in this show? It’s mind boggling.

I am not gonna finish it after watching episode 5. It is now revealed who the bad guy is and frankly, I thought this was a terrible choice as well. I am not curious to find out what Sol is hiding nor do I care to find out how the relationship between the twin sisters is gonna develop. I am still interested in new Star Wars series by Disney, but The Acolyte is pretty much a disaster as far as I’m concerned. I can only hope that Disney will learn from this costly mistake.

Light & Magic: The Making of Cinema Magic

Special effects have always been a huge part of movies. From King Kong (1933), to the Ray Harryhousen films with the brilliant stop-motion effects, to the stunning 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). Movies offer viewers the chance to see things that cannot be seen any other way. The six-part Disney Plus documentary Light & Magic tells the story of Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) that played an enormous part in the evolution of visual effects in Hollywood movies. The company was founded by George Lucas when he was working on his first Star Wars movie in 1977. He visited every optical effects company in the industry, but found none that could deliver what he had in mind.

2001: A Space Odyssey had really pushed the boundaries in what could be achieved in visual effects, but the movie was slow. Lucas wanted to create speed and energy. He wanted to see dog flights in space. He met a special effects man called John Dykstra, who was part of a small community of special effects people. He hired him to set up the team of model makers, storyboard artists and camera and light people at the newly founded ILM.

The first two episodes show the extremely challenging process of getting the first Star Wars film made. Thousands of elements had to be combined into extremely complicated shots. There were many desperate moments, but the end result was amazing and audiences and industry experts were blown away. Nobody but the people at ILM could have done it back then. It inspired many directors to also push the envelope in special effects the following years and decades, like James Cameron: “I went home, and said to my wife; ‘I quit my job. You have to pay the bills for a while, cause I’m gonna make a film’.”

The third episode is about ILM’s challenge to create a worthy sequel: The Empire Strikes Back (1980). This classical space opera had even more complicated special effects to accomplish. Like always with sequels, the scale was much larger than the first movie. The team also got other assignments than Star Wars, namely Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981), Dragonslayer (1981) and ET: the Extra-Terrestrial (1982). Movies that were nominated for or won Academy Awards for their amazing visual effects.

Lucas also got interested in computers and he hired Ed Catmull to digitize processes. The computer team made the impressive terraforming sequence in Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Kahn (1982) and this can be seen as the beginning of computer generated effects in movies. This inspired Lucas and the ILM people to get into it. Catmull’s division (Pixar) was later sold to Steve Jobs and they turned it into a cartoon company.

The next major project was Return of the Jedi (1983), the most complex movie in terms of visual effects ever conceived. “It was not a fun movie to make”, says one of the team members. But the result surely was fun to watch. Each of the 900 visual effects shots was a triumph for the ILM team. It was followed up by a number of other eighties classics: Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984), The Goonies (1985) and Back to the Future (1985). Each new project had its own challenges, and the attitude at ILM always was: ‘let’s do something that’s never been done before.’

In episode 5 titled ‘Morphing’, the computer era is really about to take off. The first successful computer effect was the water creature in James Cameron’s The Abyss (1989). Now that film could be translated into pixels that could be manipulated, anything became possible. But the industry needed a proof of concept and the 90 seconds sequence in The Abyss was just that. But as always with new technology, there is resentment at first. They called digital ‘the dark side’. Digital wasn’t yet seen as the main thing, but as an addition to old school effects. The model shop remained the central place in ILM’s laboratory.

Then one day, James Cameron called and he wanted to do something way bigger than The Abyss. He pitched them: Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991). A liquid metal man was a huge leap from a water snake. The team had only nine months to create the T-1000. They first had to capture actor Robert Patrick in data. They filmed his muscles and how he moved. Once they had him digital, they combined all special effects with the right lighting, so it all seems to be part of the same world. The end result was stunning. One ILM guy recalls the T-1000 walking through the bars in the mental institution; an impossible shot. This was truly groundbreaking stuff.

The following year, another major movie would truly signal the end of traditional special effects. They had planned to create the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park (1993) with advanced stop motion animation. Spielberg hired the best guys in the business. Stan Winston would design the creatures and Phil Tippett would animate them. He also hired Michael Lantieri, a practical effects genius and Dennis Muren, a visual effects wizard. The team had already built the dinosaurs, and Light & Magic gives us a few images of what the Velociraptors looked like with stop-motion. They’re certainly impressive, but since we are now used to digital effects, the unrealness becomes an issue. Once they did a successful test with a digital T-Rex running through a landscape everybody knew: visual effects will never be the same again. “I feel extinct”, said Tippett, and Spielberg used that line in the movie.

So 1993 was the year of the big breakthrough of digital effects, and they would be used for many successful movies in the nineties, like The Mask (1994), Forrest Gump (1994), Jumanji (1995) and Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace (1999). The documentary series ends with the final innovation that the visionary George Lucas had anticipated all along. The tv-series The Mandalorian (2019) is shot entirely in a round set called ‘The Volume’. This is ILM’s replacement for the green-screen. It uses a massive, curved LED screen to create photorealistic backdrops, circumventing the need for outdoor locations or extensive physical sets. Due to this innovation, The Mandalorian is able to deliver Star Wars effects on a tv-schedule and budget. ILM, which had started with a group of creative designers in a warehouse at Van Nuys, is still pushing the boundaries in creating cinema magic today, now also for the small screen.

5 topseries in ultieme fantasy streaming jaar 2022

Voor de liefhebber van fantasy wordt 2022 een topjaar. Deze vijf series wil je niet missen:

1. House of the Dragon

Streamen Via: HBO Max

HBO is het huis voor baanbrekende televisieseries. Eind jaren 90’ veranderde de kabeldienst het medium met series als The Sopranos, Deadwood en The Wire. En het vorige decennium deden ze dat nog een keer met Game of Thrones dat aantoonde dat televisie ook een plek kan zijn voor high budget fantasy spektakel. House of the Dragon wordt niet baanbrekend in die zin omdat het voortborduurt op een bestaand succes. Echter, de eerste vier afleveringen die nu zijn verschenen tonen aan dat HotD alles in zich heeft om een hit te worden: fantastische personages, acteurs (o.a. Paddy Considine en Matt Smith zijn fantastisch), speciale effecten en waanzinnige art direction. Als je na acht seizoenen Game of Thrones genoeg dacht te hebben van Westeros met al het brute geweld en politieke gekonkel, is het kijken van de eerste aflevering van HotD genoeg om je op andere gedachten te brengen. Dat was bij mij althans het geval.

2. The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power

Streamen Via: Amazon Prime

De langverwachte serie The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power is eindelijk gearriveerd en we kunnen weer ademhalen: het is in elk geval geen complete ramp geworden. Al zijn er de nodige Tolkien fans (en Elon Musk) die daar anders over denken. Naar mijn bescheiden mening hebben de eerste drie afleveringen een aantal forse plussen en minnen. Om te beginnen met de nadelen; er zit geen enkele payoff in de eerste afleveringen. Natuurlijk moet het verhaal opgebouwd worden, maar de beste scriptschrijvers maken van individuele afleveringen bevredigende mini-films. Deze storytelling is een opeenhoping van open vragen en dat werkt niet goed. Ook over de casting van een aantal acteurs heb ik m’n twijfels. Aan de positieve kant: dit is de duurste serie ooit en dat is te zien. Bij de eerste aanblik van het eilandkoninkrijk Númenor viel mijn mond letterlijk open; stunning. Ook zijn er al een aantal geslaagde actiescènes die de potentie van de show laten zien; dit gaat alleen nog maar beter worden. Het verhaal, over de opkomst van dark lord Sauron in Midden-Aarde, lijkt goed uitgewerkt te zijn en is zeker boeiend genoeg voor een serie van meerdere seizoenen. Kortom, de mega-investering van Amazon lijkt redelijk goed uit te pakken. Ik ben voorlopig zeker aan boord.

3. Andor

Streamen Via: Disney Plus

Na The Book of Boba Fett en Obi-Wan Kenobi is dit de derde live-action Star Wars serie die Disney Plus dit jaar naar buiten brengt. De output stelt tot nu toe nog niet teleur en de verwachtingen van Andor zijn dan ook hooggespannen. Voor wie de draad wat betreft het Star Wars universum even kwijt is: Andor (voornaam Cassian) is één van de helden van de film Star Wars: Rogue One uit 2016. Deze serie wordt een prequel van die behoorlijk goede film en zal gaan over de vroege strijd van de rebellen tegen het keizerrijk. De terugkeer van de tot nu toe succesvolste Star Wars spinoff The Mandalorian staat gepland voor 2023, dus Andor moet de fans tot die tijd zoet weten te houden. Aan de trailer te zien gaat dat waarschijnlijk prima lukken.

4. The Sandman

Streamen Via: Netflix

The Sandman, gebaseerd op de naar verluid briljante strip van Neil Gaiman, is een van de grotere Netflix-series dit jaar. Zoals gebruikelijk lanceerde de streamingdienst de serie integraal op het platform in augustus. De serie bestaat uit tien delen en later werd daar nog een bonusaflevering toegevoegd. The Sandman kreeg overwegend positieve kritieken en de serie is ontegenzeggelijk origineel. Maar het is niet echt mainstream-materiaal. Net als de strip is dit meer een cult succes te noemen. Een nadeel van The Sandman vond ik dat de afleveringen een beetje los zand zijn. Het overkoepelende verhaal wist me niet echt mee te trekken, vooral niet na de belangrijke vijfde aflevering. Daarna vond ik het steeds lastig om niet af te haken. Maar de onbekende Tom Sturridge als het titelkarakter is goed gecast, en heeft iets fascinerends over zich. Ook ziet de serie er fantastisch uit en zitten er genoeg boeiende personages om het toch absoluut de moeite waard te maken.

5. Willow

Streamen Via: Disney Plus

Nog een traktatie (hoop ik!) die in november op Disney Plus zal verschijnen is de serie Willow. Met Warwick Davis in de hoofdrol, maar zonder Val Kilmer (Kilmer’s ex-vrouw Joanne Whalley keert wel terug). Een nieuwe aanwinst voor de cast is Christian Slater. De film Willow uit 1986 kwam uit de koker van George Lucas en is één van de beste fantasy films uit de jaren 80’ (na The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi en Excalibur). Als de serie hetzelfde gehalte aan epische verhalen, donkere magie en heerlijke slechteriken heeft als de film wordt het nostalgisch genieten. De schrijvers en regisseurs brengen de nodige ervaring mee, maar kunnen zij het fantastische bronmateriaal omtoveren tot een moderne interpretatie die precies de juiste snaren weet te raken? We gaan het zien.