Europa in (permanente) crisis

Europa

Wanneer je Den Haag binnenrijdt, betreed je gelijk een andere wereld. Dit is waar de leiders van ons land zich ophouden. Vorige week woonde ik een lezing bij van prof. Mark Mazower (Columbia University) over de uitdagingen van Europa. Er waren wel 200 aanwezigen, allen leden van de Haagse elite; politici, intellectuelen en (hoge) ambtenaren. Ik voelde me een outsider – dat ben ik ook in deze kringen – en zo werd ik ook wel aangekeken. Wat je hier aantreft op deze bijeenkomsten is geen afspiegeling van de maatschappij.

Mazower betoogt dat het gezien de aanhoudende crisis in Europa makkelijk is om het zicht te verliezen op waar het allemaal om gaat. Maar waar gaat het eigenlijk om? Wat is het grotere plaatje? Volgens de professor gaat het Europese verbond in essentie om betere leefomstandigheden creëren voor iedere Europeaan. En daar kan niemand op tegen zijn. Verder moeten we stereotypen vermijden. Grieken zijn niet lui. Nederlanders die in Griekenland wonen betalen ook geen belasting. Het is het systeem dat niet goed is.

Klinkt als een nobel doel, maar gezien de enorme cultuurverschillen zou het doel net zo goed betere leefomstandigheden voor alle burgers ter wereld kunnen zijn. Wellicht heb ik meer met een Fransman dan een Taiwanees, cultureel gezien. Maar in tijden waarin de welvaart niet overvloeit, zullen mensen meer gefocust zijn op wat ze zelf verliezen dan op wat anderen kunnen winnen. Nationalisme zal oplaaien, dat is onvermijdelijk.

Natuurlijk zal een deel van de meer verlichte zielen in dit land de strategische doelen van het Europese project niet uit het ogen verliezen. Maar ondertussen blijven er brandjes ontstaan die snel uitwoeien tot enorme branden. We blijven voorlopig bezig met het blussen van die brandjes en het zal voor veel Europeanen lastig blijken solidair te zijn met elkaar. Er wachten nog donkere dagen voor het continent.

Het momentum van de jaren 70′

‘Maybe it’s the most important thing happening in the whole universe’

Ach ja, de seventies: het mooiste tijdperk waarin ik nooit geleefd heb. ‘Taking Woodstock’ (2009 – 40 jaar na Woodstock) brengt je er naar toe.

De Taiwanese regisseur Ang Lee (‘Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon’ / ‘Brokeback Mountain’ / ‘Life of Pi’) kan geen kwaad bij me doen. Alhoewel ‘The Hulk’ was………..

‘Taking Woodstock’ is alleen een aanrader voor een bepaald type freak. Voor iemand die in deze tijd bij de hippies had willen horen, maar niet helemaal. Voor een observator, een commentator, maar wel iemand die liefdevol is. En iemand die een hekel heeft aan het ‘establishment’, maar geen cynicus. Zo iemand dus.

De film gaat over een jongen – Elliot – die in het Amerikaanse gehucht El Monaco een motel runt met zijn ouders. De bank dreigt de boel te sluiten, maar door Elliot’s toedoen wordt het grootste festival aller tijden in de buurt georganiseerd: Woodstock, drie dagen vrede en muziek. Dat levert de familie de nodige cashflow op.

Het mooie van de film is de anticipatie. Er staat iets groots te gebeuren, het belangrijkste hippiefestival aller tijden. We zien het arriveren van duizenden hippies, die allemaal voelen: dit is het moment. Nu gaat het gebeuren… Liefde. En mooie, erotische, opwindende, magistrale, vreemde, magische, monumentale, en soms angstaanjagende momenten. Zulke anticipatie – als je het meemaakt – is goud. En de jaren 70′ zat er vol mee.

Binnenin het gebeuren plaatst Lee de dynamiek van een kleine familie, want Elliot moet ontglippen aan de grip van zijn dominante moeder. En familie dynamiek in Lee’s specialisme. Het neerzetten van een tijdsbeeld ook. En hoe pakt Lee het tot leven brengen van historische rockartiesten aan, zoals Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin en The Grateful Dead die op het festival hun opwachting maakten? Dat doet hij niet. Zoals een hippie het zegt; ‘je kunt toch niet zien wie op het podium staat’. En dat zal zo geweest zijn. Ach, wat ik zal zei; het gaat om de anticipatie.

Ja, de jaren 70’s was fantastisch: er waren idealen. Er was ook horror, neem de oorlog in Vietnam, maar er was een beweging gaande.

De hippies hadden uiteindelijk ook niet de antwoorden en de beweging stierf een tragische dood. Er is helaas niet iets blijvends ontstaan door Woodstock. Het zijn gewoon een half miljoen hippies geweest die uit hun plaat zijn gegaan op drugs. Ze hebben de wereld niet kunnen verbroederen. Maar daar waren ze wel mee bezig, en dat lijkt me een mooi iets om mee bezig te zijn. Stuur mij maar die kant op als de tijdmachine een feit is.

‘Wat gaat er nu gebeuren?’ vraagt Elliot aan één van de organisatoren van het festival. ‘Een nieuw festival in San Francisco’, antwoord hij. ‘Nog mooier dan dit festival.’ En dat is misschien wel een mooie metafoor voor de hele hippiebeweging. Ze hadden niet de antwoorden, maar hielden wel de mindset van vrede en liefde levend. En misschien bestaat die nog steeds wel. Ik voel de anticipatie al… Is het nog mogelijk anno 2015?

Woodstock 1

Woodstock 2

Woodstock 3

Woodstock 4

Woodstock 5

Woodstock 6

Woodstock 7

Woodstock 8

Woodstock 9

Woodstock 10

Woodstock 11

The Story of Film: Time Traveling For the Cinemad

It had to be done someday; making a literal odyssey through the history of cinema and documenting it into a film. The traveller is Mark Cousins. The film is a 15 hour documentary called ‘The Story of Film’. Through cinematic innovation, the story of film is told, from the silent era to the multimillion dollar digital age, covering all continents, major cinematic hallmarks and most talented people in cinema.

The Story of Film 1

The beginning
In 1885 George Eastman of Kodak came up with the idea of film on a role. Then Edison figured that if you spin the images in a box you get the illusion of movement. Lumiere went on to invent the film projector and with that: Cinema! It is not difficult to imagine the excitement of those first screenings. When cinemas started appearing everywhere, it enabled people – who did not travel back then – to see other countries. Not just places, but other worlds. Like what the position of woman was in other countries.

After the invention came the content. And despite of what many believe, it is not the money men that drive cinema. They can’t. Because what you need is the visual ideas, and a clear understanding of what is in people’s hearts. It is psychology that became the driving force of film if anything.

Cousins continues to show us the birth of basic cinema language and techniques that are now common, such as editing, the close up, tracking shots and flashbacks. The road trip then takes us further to the places and the people that brought life to this sublime art form.

1910s
In this period a lot was happening in Scandinavia. Maybe it was the Northern Light, Cousins comments. Or the sense of destiny and mortality in Scandinavian literature that made Danish and Swedish movies more graceful and honest. In 1906 the first feature film was shot in Australia: ‘The Story of the Kelly Gang’. The first feature film in Hollywood was ‘The Squaw Man’ (1914). In 1911 the first movie studio was build. Another interesting thing about this period was that a lot of women were working in Hollywood writing and directing, such as Lois Weber and Alice Guy. They did not always get the credits though.

1920s
In Hollywood, cinema became big business in this period (and a men’s world as well). The 1920s saw the birth of an industry in Hollywood. But the studio system did not get in the film, according to Stanley Donen (director ‘Singing in the Rain’). There were also rebels that emerged – like Orson Welles – that tried to break the bubble. In Europe, cinema developed also. Thematically, the city was often the Big Evil. Think for example ‘Metropolis’ and ‘Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans’. In Japan it was as if the Japanese filmmakers tried to compensate for the massacres their country caused by making very humanistic films. In 1921, the first great Japanese movie was made: ‘Souls on the Road’.

1930s
A lot of innovations were introduced in the 1930s like sound and the use of two camera’s with overhead lighting. From Hollywood came horror movies like ‘Frankenstein’ which borrowed heavily from Germany (Der Golem). And the first gangster pictures appeared, which is an original American genre. The cartoon also arrived and was a very successful new genre. Mickey Mouse was a smash hit and in 1937 came the even more successful ‘Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs’. In Britain, the legendary Alfred Hitchcock started working. He understood the basic human emotion ‘fear’ like no other, and his films are still extremely influential to this day.

1940s
The war years meant less glory, and more gloomy films. In Italy we witnessed the birth of neo realism. The sensational ‘The Bicycle Thieves’ (1939) is a movie that best illustrates this style. In 1941 came ‘Citizen Kane’ – a film that is still often considered by many as one of the greatest movies of all time. It used deep staging so audiences could choose where to look. This was previously used in films like ‘Gone With the Wind’ (1939) and ‘Stagecoach’ (1939), which Welles said to have seen 39 times. A dark genre arrived in Hollywood, called Film Noir. These films, such as ‘Double Indemnity’ usually had characters with flaws that drove them towards their faith, even while they tried to avoid it. The decade ended as depressing as it began with a massive communist hunt in Hollywood: the studios had to fire the (alleged) lefties. This is still a major trauma in Hollywood.

1950s
In America in the fifties, we had the suburban, Christian society. But under the surface there was anger, frustration and tension. Classic films like ‘On the Waterfront’ (1954) and ‘Rebel Without a Cause’ (1955) best illustrate this. In Europe four legendary directors led the way in changing cinema. They were Jacques Tati, Robert Bresson, Ingmar Bergman and Federico Fellini, and they made films more personal and self aware than they had ever been. The era ended with the new wave to which French director Jean-Luc Godard belonged and in Italy Pier Paolo Pasolini. The later used religious music for everyday struggles. He felt consumerism was taking over.

The Story of Film 2

1960s
Sergio Leone made his first ‘spaghetti western’ (Italian made Western) and introduced deep focus, which was made possible by the Italian cinematic invention technoscope in 1960. This gives Leone’s movies an epic feel to them. Thematically, Leone was inspired by Japanese Master Akira Kurosawa (lone gunman / lone samurai). Filmmaking went global in the sixties. In Eastern Europe, directors like Roman Polanski and Milos Forman started their careers. In the Soviet Union, one of the greatest directors ever started working: Andrei Tarkovsky, who knew how to create remarkable imagery. According to Tarkovsky: ‘Imagery contains an awareness of the infinite.’ Late sixties, film schools were popping up all around the USA and a new generation was on its way.

1970s
After the realism in movies in the sixties, the seventies saw a return of old fashioned, romantic and entertaining cinema – and of the box office smash hits, think ‘Star Wars’, ‘The Exorcist’ and ‘Jaws’. ‘The Godfather’ was the return of an old Hollywood genre: the gangster film. New kids were fighting to open up new form, most notably Martin Scorsese with ‘Taxi Driver’ and ‘Mean Streets’. When people think of the seventies, they think about Spielberg, Lucas, Coppola and Scorsese. But there was more. In i.a. Britain and Italy, identity was a major theme. In Germany, Rainer Werner Fassbinder (woman in closed places) and Wim Wenders (men in open spaces) had their glory years. And Werner Herzog the explorer went across the world. He was not so much interested in the feminism or Americana of his contemporaries, but in prime evil life. After John Ford, he is the most important landscape filmer in the history of film. The 70’s also saw the arrival of Asian mainstream, epic films from India (‘Sholay’) and a lot of cinematic activity in Africa.

1980s
After the magnificent seventies came the not-so-great eighties. ‘Protest’ is the central theme of this decade. The 5th generation in China – Chen Kaige and Zhang Yimou – made interesting movies. From Russia came one of the greatest war movies: ‘Come and See’. In America, ‘Top Gun’ was a smash hit, and many movies were influenced by music video’s, like ‘Flashdance’. In France, filmmakers got more into popular culture, which was a protest in itself. Notable directors that moved up in the film world were David Lynch (with ‘Blue Velvet’) and David Cronenberg in Canada with ‘Videodrome’, a prophetic vision of the modern world in which the real and the televisual are dangerously confused.

1990s
Described by Cousins as the last days of celluloid, before the coming of digital. And directors like Wong Kar Wai and Hou Hsiao-hsien used celluloid devotedly. The 90s saw passionate films about other worlds (‘The Matrix’), but also an obsession about reality, for example in the work of Iranian director Abbas Kiarostami who tried to eliminate all dolly’s and clapperboards from the set. From Japan came horror movies about the fear for technology, like ‘Tetsuo’ about a man blending with metal. In Copenhagen, filmmakers returned to primitive filmmaking with Dogma, while Hollywood saw the increasing use of digital effects (‘Terminator 2’ / ‘Gladiator’ / ‘Jurassic Park’). Not only what was in the camera changed, what happened in front of the camera changed as well. Modern became post-modern: The idea that there are no new truths and everything is recycled. Tarantino made this his trade, but respected established directors, like Scorsese, used it as well.

2000s
Documentaries – like ‘Fahrenheit 9/11’ – did as well as blockbusters and blockbusters tried to be like documentaries. Innovative movies were made in the USA. Like ‘Requiem For a Dream’: The great distortion movie. The subconscious got at work in ‘Mulholland Drive’. And in Thailand: ‘Tropical Malady’, a film that changes from simplistic tale of friendship to the mythical story of the hunter and the hunted. The film reincarnates like its main character. Another innovative example is ‘Russian Ark’, which consists of one 90 minute long take showing Aristocrats walking downstairs in a massive palace towards the slaughter.

And the future of cinema? Who knows. Perhaps one day we can share dreams like in ‘Inception’. One thing is for sure: Whatever form it may take, the art of cinema is here to stay and deserves to be celebrated likes this.

Icon 29 - Movie Camera

 

- Aanbevolen Divider

Top 10 intro (credit sequences) van TV-series

https://jkleyngeld.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/

5 elementen van een krachtig verhaal

10 management lessons from highly successful gangsters

5 Reasons ‘Scarface’ Rarely Makes it to Critics’ Favorite Lists

Dr. Martin Luther King’s ‘I Have a Dream’ Speech (summary)

Delivered 28 August 1963, at the Lincoln Memorial, Washington D.C.

I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.

Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.

But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. And so we’ve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.

I Have a Dream Speech

In a sense we’ve come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the ‘unalienable Rights’ of ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked ‘insufficient funds.’

But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we’ve come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.

…It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. And those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. And there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.

…There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, ‘When will you be satisfied?’ We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro’s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their self-hood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating: ‘For Whites Only.’ We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until ‘justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.’

I Have a Dream Speech 2

… Let us not wallow in the valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends.

And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of ‘interposition’ and ‘nullification’ — one day right there in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today!

Read the whole speech here:
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkihaveadream.htm